Judgement Day

Not a post about Terminator, I'm sorry. 

More a post about termination, the terminus, and the terminal.

The semester is over, and I cannot stop judging it. I feel this semester I was terribly incompitent. I let myself get distracted and did not attend to the work, the people, the human beings around me who were placed in my life.

My questions were not sharp, and my answers came too quickly. 

I was very much like the people who fund and support these trucks and their message. "If I can just make it to that day," I thought, "Everything will be settled. I will be happy. All will be solved."

Well, here is that day, and I would like nothing more than to go back and have another go with these people. But that can't be done. Suffering, suffering. I create Judgement Day and its required hell, punishment, and grief.

Attitudes like the one that funds this sort of message (the truck message) is a distraction from an atttiude that, while definitionally secular in many senses, is the beating heart of religion - attend to the moments of your life as they come, and only as they come.

Worrying or planning for a day of attonement (even if not as extreme as these folks make it out to be) can distract you from the attonement of this moment, and this one, and myriad millions of instances which for convenience and to keep ourselves sane we call "our life."

Attending to our lives and not an imaginary day to come insures that we all fall into grace and pass our judgement day - the question is: Who are you and where are you right now? If you can answer that, if you can attend to that, I think you are on your way to avoiding hell.

Why do I not attend to right now and write about these feelings? Why do I sit, eating an orange, and play my Obi-Wan semester back in my head again and again? One can't clean up without picking up what's immediately around her.

The semester is over, this cannot be changed. It will never come around again. The students will not have another teacher, nor another go at that class. All of this can be mourned or it can be accepted as it is. Terminus does not mean terminal. Today: There are clouds; the leaves dance in the breeze. I examine articles for my summer course. Judgement day, right now, always right now. Always right here.

 

Posted
 

Anxiously Awaiting Summer

It is a horrible time. That time just before summer where debate fades out and you realize just how behind on everything else in your life you have become.
 
It's also the time of year where I constantly worry that I have forgotten to make a hotel reservation, book travel, or register for something. I live in a state of paranoia about quiet, long evenings at home. Something is wrong, something has been forgotten.
 
But it's an adjustment period, and by late May I will have fully embraced the summer life. But I am already thinking about next term. Walking home today I was thinking of how to re-arrange my speech course to make it more useful. I was thinking of eliminating an argument based assignment on identifying propaganda, but it's too good to really dismiss. Here are the questions we had today:
 
What was the first official act of propaganda?
Is seeking such an origin useful?
Are toys propaganda?
What will you hand your child to play with when you are a parent?
At what age are you immune from propagandistic images? Is age a good determinant?
What are the systemic and surface modes of propaganda? (derived from watching a clip of the TV show "Jersey Shore" which I had never seen and was proud of, thanks for ruining it for me)
Is it ok to use propaganda to combat propaganda?
Is it ok to use something based solely on the rubric of effectiveness?
 
This has me thinking of some sort of assessment or some final examination project where students generate lists of questions as the result of the semester. For what else do we have of value?
 
Posted
 

USU Semifinals

Burlington-20110403-00014

THB in a constitutional right to a minimum standard of living.

Posted from Burlington, VT
 

USU Quarterfinal Round

THW instruct juries to acquit where they believe conviction not to be in the public interest.
Posted
 

USU Octofinal

THB that human shields are a legitimate target in war.
Posted
 

USU Breaking Teams

Burlington-20110402-00013

Judges:
David Hernandez
Eric barnes
Josh martin
Melissa franke
Steve johnson
Shaun briscoe
Steve west
Siddarth
Michael behr
Stephen boyle
Sam natale
David register
Adam goldstien
Rob margesson
Mike aguillera Jaime wright
Steve llano
Mary nugent
Sharmilla
Gavin illsey
Leela koenig
Eikis g
Michaela hernandez
Simone van elk
Monica ferris
Rhydian morgan
Alternates: jan hobvden and ali hamlin

Teams:
18 harvard BE
15 yale DF
Yale BE
14 UCD LSOR
Laverne MT
Portland State BB
Seattle SW
Carleton CM
Claremont SW
Swarthmore KM
13 LMU CK
Alaska CS
St Johns CM
Vermont AC
Claremont CB
Alaska FP
St Johns FP
12 NSW KM
Alaska CH
Edinburough BO
Colgate BC
Cornell BY
Queens EW
Tie: Regis BD
Bates EM
Forham MM
12 laverne PP
Colgate SS
Patrick Henry GW
Vermont GL
Harvard KR
Seattle ?? (Inaudible)

33-35 teams who missed but stil on 12:
Hartvard GJ
Colgate L T
Alaska GJ

I put the points when they were announced.

Posted from Burlington, VT
 

USU Round 6

Stephen Boyle thanked the judging pool for their hard and good work! Good feedback and good judging from the DCAs. There is context: "Intellectual property is one or more of patents, copyright or trademarks." This was read to the debaters before the motion was read. Round 6: TH would charge an annual tax on intellectual property.
Posted
 

USU Round 5

THW create a public forum for active duty military personnel to criticize government policy.
Posted
 

USU Round 4

THW would mandate a quota for women on the boards of large corporations.
Posted
 

USU Round 3

THW grant amnesty to dictators who voluntarily leave office.
Posted